Here more of their faulty logic:https://kiwifarms.net/threads/jacob-s-blaustein-ryu238-ryu289.99675/post-10144752
I don’t think he insists on exclusivity necessarily, but his argument is just as stupid anyway: he argues that some people can molest kids without being sexually attracted to them at all.
He says some child molesters are just opportunistic and would molest anyone, adults, men, women or children. He claims it’s motivated by sadistic, non sexual urges, not a genuine sexual attraction.
Maybe this is correct in some spergy, academic psych context, but (and this is Jacob’s poor grasp of language) that’s not what the word means in English in general.
It’s like the dumb gotcha reddit nerds try to pull with tomatoes being a fruit. Yes, tomatos are botanically/anatomically the fruit of the plant but that’s not what the word means by default. That’s only what the word means in a narrow, non-standard context.
Now take fruit vs veggie and apply it to his gross, horrifying sexual interest
Language is descriptive not prescriptive. He is trying to have the words define the truth instead of explaining it. By doing so they are trying to control the argument and make a strawman that doesn’t follow a more precise definition like I am using.
This guy is worse:
Homosexuality isn’t a crime. Pedophilia is a crime. @ryu289, you yourself have engaged in one of the fallacies you’re so obsessed with (and one you called out Coffey on like a complete retard)- a strawman fallacy. You’re misrepresenting their argument by making it easier to attack. This would have stood if we were still in the ages where homosexuals were stoned to death in the streets, or if we all lived in some middle eastern shithole. Yet, we don’t. You are comparing apples and oranges. A much better argument would have been:
“Replace ‘pedophile’ with ‘rapist’ we can see how absurd your logic is.”
Pedophiles act upon those who cannot consent, making them the exact same as (if not worse than) rapists. Notice how your argument therein holds zero water still, considering the fact that both of them are disgusting criminals. This is because you are a dumb retard who fucks little girls and hides behind gay people.
Also, since pedophilia is a crime, if you are a “MAP ally,” then you are a criminal accomplice and can go to prison.
(Also, yes. Pedophilia applies to non-offenders as well. You can be a pedophile without sexually assaulting children. The idea that you can’t is just fucking stupid, especially when pedophilia is literally a mental disorder that can be diagnosed and can get people referred to therapy.)
I use the most up-to-date legal definitions available because they determine whether or not people like you rot in prison. Cope and seethe all you’d like, the law is above every single definition from every single Wordpress website you scour through. Then again, I don’t expect pedophiles like you to enjoy legality very much.
You keep mentioning this, yet I keep giving you legal definition after legal definition that child sex abuse means pedophilia regardless of attraction.
This feels like a lazy induction. Like because the law defines something, that makes it true. It’s like the arguemnts against gay marriage.