This isn’t helping your case at all. (not that you really had one to begin with)
You lot openly advocate for terrorism so long as its fits your goals and are openly saying you would break the law. Not a good look
1 Like
So if SCOTUS says (which they likely will) that laws criminalizing the possession, receipt, sale, or interstate transport of child sex dolls are unconstitutional and invalid, LEA is still going to justifiably seize and fine people who exercise their rights to do so?? I don’t understand your prose.
It’s almost like your brain is hard-wired not to understand this concept.
2 Likes
Again, vigilantes themselves are criminals. Criminals have bounties on their heads. Bounty hunter, on the other hand, is a legitimate (and apparently complicated) profession. The vigilantes, who are self-professed hunters, can quickly become the hunted.
2 Likes
State level will. The feds might not, but the feds likely won’t intervene at the states if we decide to ignore the supreme court ruling so the prohibition of child sex dolls will stand in any state that choses to enforce it. The states would technically be breaking the law, but so what? If this ruling does not get enforced who cares? They are dead words on a piece of paper.
I’m pretty damn sure the ancient roman code had laws on the books which did not have an end date. In other words the ancient romans intended their laws to exist in perpetuity. Yet are we bound by such laws on a technicality? Possibly even if one lives in Greece. But they are but dead words on a piece of paper with no roman police to enforce them so it does not matter. The same is true for any law from a long gone empire. And it’s same for many laws which are routinely ignored.
Bottom line: If the Supreme court rules the criminalization of child sex dolls as unconstitutional, we do not care on the state level. We will and we shall safely ignore it.
Well, right now, I’m pretty sure that the Roman Empire has fallen, especially after the Huns romped all over them. However, at its height, and given that you seem to be a religious person, I would like to remind you that the Roman Empire did shut up a pansy carpenter once.
2 Likes
Here’s an hour-long livestream interview that I recently conducted on YouTube with a group of doll owners, in which the idea of banning only “small” dolls comes up: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BdV2P7K2YA
2 Likes
I will watch… Why should non pedophilic doll owners have their identities tarnished by small doll owners?
Because all doll owners are ants on the same string.
1 Like
I love their petty bullshit excuses about how these dolls are too heavy. A sex doll of a slender woman that is 5 ft 8 would weigh about 120 lb. I am 123 lb and 5 ft 5 and I can carry 120 lb very easily. I don’t buy the bullshit “IT’s ToO HeaVy”. Yeah, not very convincing. Stop purchasing these tiny dolls that can be too easily confused for child sex abuse dolls and start buying adult sized dolls.
Child sex abuse dolls aren’t a thing, dearie.
No child or adult is harmed in the production and ownership of a doll. It is a non-threatening hobby.
We really should stop conflating the ownership of any object with the actions a person does to people. Many people own kitchen knives to use them for food preparation but they do not use them to murder. It’s possible to be a good sensible person with a knife in the hand! We should not mix non-threatening people and their strange hobbies with the dangerous mental illness of psychosis just because it suites one’s personal distaste of the hobby.
There is no difference between a big doll and small doll in the eyes of an unprejudiced doll enthusiast. There should not be separate laws on what kind of collectible plastic toys you can and cannot own. There should not even be any laws at all imposed on things that do not involve a living person being wronged or put at risk of danger.
There seems to be an assumption that “people who have sex dolls want to sexually violate people” and this is poisonous thinking. But if such idealism wins the bet it will be a sad day where doll enthusiasts who have done nothing at all to anybody suddenly become criminals overnight just because they bought a baby doll!! I guess that’s the world some people want. In the same world, you might as well ban computers, since that’s how most abusive content is distributed. We should screen parents too for mental disabilities before they can legally have children, since most abuse happens in the family and not some random person nobody knows.
3 Likes
This alone should be enough to keep people from trying to ban/criminalize them. They take offense to what it is they represent and assume that alone is sufficient to justify their prohibition. They’re not open to reason as you’re not arguing with points founded by reason.
Evidence is slowly trickling in on the effects of fictionalized pornography and sex dolls have on people with paraphilias, specifically pedophilia, and the data, although inconclusive, seem to lean more towards having no causal correlation with crimes, recidivism, or abuse.
As a matter of policy, “I’m offended” should never be a valid justification for censoring speech or prohibiting things.
3 Likes