It might comfort you to know that you are not alone among anarchists here. i.e. 1, 2, 3, 4
It is not a topic which researchers would be very willing to study specifically, as academia is an establishment which is still heavily pressured to maintain the status quo. I am sure that, however, we here are all aware enough that CSA is primarily perpetrated by older people with authority over the victim. An anarchist MAP ally explains the idea further here.
You seem to be subscribing to the popular notion that “anarchy = chaos.” Anarchists are perfectly capable of organizing, though in a decentralized and horizontal manner. Rojava, a near-anarchist region, has remained standing after around ten years.
Lol, gender and age essentialism in one. Testosterone is not poison. Funnily enough, that’s a common argument used by TERFs to deny transmascs autonomy.
Teenagers, like all other humans, are products of our environment. If you seriously cannot think of a teen male who thinks and acts any differently from that, you have an extremely limited view of what human beings are like and are most likely projecting.
Right to self-harm and right to autonomy is more important than harm reduction. Nor is hierarchical coercion a particularly effective way of preventing that harm in the first place. Informing them something is harmful =/= telling them they are not allowed to do it or forcing them to not do it. Where is it that you live where children (who have been taught running in traffic is dangerous and harmful to them) are dying to do so and are only don’t because of adult authority figures, anyway?
Do you believe you yourself and the people close to you are equally likely to be conned as this average adult you are describing? Do you believe giving external people coercive power over them is the optimal way to prevent conning? Why would those people in particular be uniquely less likely to be conned than anyone else, and what qualifies them to have those other people submit to their authority?