This again misses the point of the problem.
We understand that very well, the few who didn’t certainly do now. Everyone however knew that sex positivity was one of Prostasia’s core principles and that they were against the stigmatisation of MAPs, regardless of their reasoning for being so. The problem therefore comes from Prostasia making statements that are stigmatising, presenting paedophilia as something innately bad that “should be eliminated”. Those statements both betray Prostasia’s principles, stigmatise MAPs and directly hurt them. The seeming refusal to acknowledge how those statements were problematic only makes the issue worse.
I respect the difficult position prostasia is in and the pressure they are under. But they are trying to do the impossible, you can’t appeal to everyone without betraying your core principles.
Going to refer to @elliot’s post as he’s basically covered all this already. Supporting Marginalized Groups