Exactly, I have almost never saw someone saying that without being on a bad fate.
5 Likes
I agree with everything you say. The reality is that only 5% of the male population.are sexually attracted to young children.The other 95% don’t understand child sexual attraction and are not sympathetic.
Although anyone is allowed to have a child sexual attraction I find that any expression of this “indulgence” in any form is considered unacceptable and I am amazed at the plethora of “justifications” for this position.
The latest rationalisation for bannning AI child pornography is that real children are used to enable the AI to generate the image and that these children experience revictimisation. Then there is the normalisation argument.
At the end of the day the problem is they don’t like men consuming any image of a child in any sexual way and they are in the majority and it will be a long time before there is any movement in opinion.
1 Like
It’s basically the same as the “repent” bullshit said by YHVH’s lapdogs.
2 Likes
I don’t usually find expressions (generally defined as free speech) something that needs to be regulated by law (at the point of a gun). There is enough real world harm being done to real children which is being covered up by religious cults, political branches, and the presidency.
1 Like