Yes, there’s a preview on the right-hand side of the composition pane. But it sometimes gets covered up by a “This post looks similar to…” box, that you have to cancel so that you can see the preview. I fixed up the quote for you.
From Prostasia’s perspective, our main concern arises when moral panic impedes us from making rational choices around abuse prevention, for example by causing us to over-invest in ineffective approaches like banning cartoons or dolls, and to under-invest in things like prevention research.
Beyond that, what one considers to be moral or immoral is a personal matter, and it’s better to leave it out of the equation as much as possible, in order that we can be laser-focused on the more important question of preventing harm, rather than preventing people from having immoral thoughts (ie. thoughtcrime).
To address your example, you can believe that someone privately “getting off” on clothed yoga videos is morally abhorrent, or you can believe that it’s morally neutral, but it’s folly to make that be the deciding factor when considering what should be done about clothed yoga videos—because if we’ve learned anything about sexuality, literally anything can get somebody off, and somebody else will think that it’s immoral for them to do so.
More important factors in deciding what to do about borderline content are what harms do these videos create, and what are the ways that we could address or prevent those harms? One of the draft principles that we have developed to guide Internet platforms in making these decisions is context:
Note the phrase or to promote it. Google may have made a problem worse by allowing its algorithms to be used to create a new catalogue of soft-exploitative material that didn’t exist before outside of sketchy chan forums. Even though we (probably) shouldn’t be censoring this material, there are also good reasons why major platforms shouldn’t be collecting it together and highlighting it in an inappropriate context.