The children’s commissioner for England has warned that end-to-end encryption is putting children at risk of abuse, as a survey finds that most eight-year-olds are using messaging apps supposedly restricted to those aged 13 or older.
In a report published on Tuesday, Anne Longfield said plans by social media firms to widen the use of encrypted messaging would make it impossible for platforms to monitor content.
Longfield argued that such technology, which keeps messaging hidden from anyone who is not a participant in a conversation, could stop police from gathering crucial evidence of child sexual exploitation.
They bang this drum so hard, it must cost a fortune to get it reskinned every time they break it.
It does, I dread to think how much of my tax goes to politicians seeing who can scream “think of the children!!” the loudest.
Perhaps the issue here is that kids aren’t being given enough information to make safe choices and that parents aren’t taking an interest in their kids lives?
Encryption is the easy target, and “think of the children” is an excuse to ban encryption, that no one will be able to publicly argue against without totally destroying their reputation, so they can destroy privacy, which has been their goal for decades.
The UK government looks at China’s surveillance state as a goal to aspire to.
Either they are making excuses for their uselessness or they want to lower net security for their own good. Under low or no encryption, hackers can easily steal anything they want, bad governments/politicians can silence anything they dislike, which puts everyone including children in even higher risk.
Uhhh… When people’s social media accounts are hacked and websites dealing with the personal and private info of literally millions experiences a breach, yeah they do need encryption. Standard AES encryption should be a no-brainer at this point.
If the feds need info for a case, then they can get it through good old-fashioned detective work or by attempting to break into a device like any other hacker.
Did you know that when info is exposed, it’s fished for by data brokers? Data brokers are illegal in many jurisdictions, but they still thrive. They collect personal info that goes beyond what Google or Amazon are allowed to collect. They sort it out, store it, and link it to identifiable persons and citizens so they can market this info to governments, companies, and yes, even hackers.
It’s not just social media. Things like smart home devices and security suites NEED unbreakable encryption! Those cameras are often hacked to spy on people, including families and children. These materials are often retained by criminals so they can exploit people for money. This happens mostly to women, but also with children and teens.
Don’t be fooled by the rhetoric of the DoJ and anti-tech groups. encryption and privacy are rights for a reason.
Then the problem isn’t encrypted message, it’s the lack of parents monitoring what their kids are doing online. I don’t think an 8 year should even have access to the internet tbh.
And what are we supposed to do? Are social media managers supposed to make impossible for users to encrypt their accounts? Is everyone who has an encrypted account and email supposed to stop using encryptions because some chomo could use that for their own favor? Is everyone who uses TOR or I2P supposed to stop using it because it’s encrypted? I get amazed how these people offer the most shallows solutions to solve problems like child predators.
Not to mention this could easily put a lot of people in risk. They could easily be victims of crackers and have personal information shared without their consent. Data brokers are also a thing. Privacy is not only a right nowadays on the “Internet World and Era”, it’s also an obligation in order to be safe online nowadays.
Wanting to stop child predators to prey on children is a good thing, but please, don’t attack things that protect people in the process. Geez.
Can corroborate. I had unlimited access to the Internet since I was 8. Almost immediately used it to look at porn. Started out vanilla, quickly escalated into all kinds of crazy shit (literally!). I truly think part of the reason I am this way today is because of that exposure. Don’t misunderstand, I already had a fascination with sex and fetishism since I was 5. But actually being able to explore those concepts via the Internet at such a young age might well have exacerbated my interests. I know I made a topic like this already and basically got told “no, that’s not how that works”, but still I wonder…