FL Woman LIED about Child Sex Doll using her Daughter's Likeness

[Giacobbe]

@island

That image of a young model whose parent posted her pictures has no idea that a private person made a likeness of them for their own personal use. Or maybe were an inspiration for a fictional likeness? Now what? So now that person who was used to create that thing deserves some kind of royalties or something?

@Kokoa_Powder

Either by masturbating while looking at them, doing IA with them or using them as inspiration to NSFW drawings

As a frequent user on the ATF booru, there’s SO MUCH HENTAI AND PORN based on the likeness of actual child actors. The little girl from Poltergeist (RIP) or the girl from the recent FNaF movie, for example. Or even stuff based on images of random not-famous children. Hell, I’ve been helping compile a blacklist of artists if we suspect/find out they’ve based their art on actual CSAM! Yeah, some artists even use actual child sex abuse to inspire fictional child sex abuse! These guys think they’re slick until those who recognize it come forward with evidence of what these “artists” have done. I’d like to know the psychology of these people…

I know I’ve talked about this before, but what I find hilarious is when a lolicon artist puts “pedos/MAPs DNI” or “100% fictional characters only” in their bio (even saw one explicitly say “MAPs and NOMAPs DNI”, wtf??), but turns around and makes a hentai based on an actual child actress. Like, huh? I’ve seen debates between several users here (including admins and mods) about there being a difference between the character a child plays and the child actor themselves. As for me, I vehemently disagree that there’s any meaningful difference.

If a person watches a live-action movie or show, she’s a child character played by a child actor/actress, and proceeds to have sexual fantasies/the need to draw sexual art of them, their attraction goes well beyond being “just a lolicon” at that point. Anybody defending themselves otherwise I deem incredulous and completely can no longer take seriously. Kanna Kamui, Anya Forger, Mabel Pines, Pan (Dragon Ball), etc.? Cartoon characters, not necessarily a pedophile! Live-action like Hermione or Stephanie or Eleven or X-23 (Logan), etc.? Nah dawg, I got some bad news for you…

I made another post some time ago also detailing some of my thoughts/feelings on the matter:

Child psychiatrist jailed after making pornographic AI deep-fakes of kids

I personally have a LOT of very mixed opinions when it comes to the subject of using a real-life reference for NSFW art. It’s a subject I struggle to come to any concrete answer on, and many whom I ask have their own opinions and admit they don’t have all the answers. Now, it should be noted that (unless I am misunderstanding) this man had non-AI CSAM. Pure photographs of naked children that he had taken without their knowledge. I fully agree that this is immoral. But let’s move away from this…

And just now I saw this other old post from a different user sharing much the same concerns as myself:

How Do You Separate Lewding A Character From A Human Being?

If this seems confusing, I’ll try to make it clearer, but I restate the central question at the bottom. This isn’t so much me having an answer, so much as me asking a question to anyone who is willing to answer it. This has been on my mind for a while, and I couldn’t find anything about it so I decided to ask here. So, first thing, I’d say creating a character obviously based on a real person and using their likeness without their consent (especially in a violent or sexual situation)… It’s comp…

---

@Kokoa_Powder

There was this dude who tried to sue Nirvana because the album’s cover is a baby pic of him. Literally NO ONE would know that he is the baby on the pic. What am I trying to say with that? If some nepio masturbated to a pic of him as a baby, how wasn’t anyone expecting it?

Even at the time, people accused Nirvana of being/catering to pedophiles by featuring uncensored baby penis on their album cover. Nirvana’s simple response boiled down to:

“Only pedophiles would actually focus this hard on a baby’s penis. What does that say about all of you?”