A user on ATF is claiming that any lolicon who claims to use loli to cope with being a pedophile isn’t really a pedophile, just a POCD sufferer. Can y’all provide articles/papers/studies/evidence to prove otherwise?
1 Like
Do you get hard when looking at loli? After getting hard, do you fap? Do you cum to loli? Do you do this so often that it is a pattern? If yes, you are a pedo.
Source: I like loli.
Not so sure I agree with that. Most lolicons have no attraction to real children and can’t be accurately diagnosed as pedophiles.
2 Likes
It doesn’t make any sense. A straight man doesn’t stop being a straight man because he faps to fictional women.
2 Likes
@Chie @freyr, the user I’m arguing with has made this claim:
Prostasia forum isn’t a legitimate source of information, it was run by someone who encouraged a minor to have a sexual relationship with an adult and attracted a lot of people who don’t prioritize child safety
Is there truth to this?
If there’s any truth to that statement, imo I’d have to say, that “someone” was likely looking for an untenable romantic relationship doomed to fail. That’s nothing that will ever work out. t’s a fictional idea that only works in a fictional sense by using a doll as a surrogate.
1 Like
More claims of theirs:
I don’t mind if pedophiles enjoy lolisho artworks, more power to them if they do, but they do it for the same reason non-pedophiles do. What I take issue with is claiming that this somehow resonates with sexual attraction to minors. Few cases of pedophiles claiming to enjoy it falls short when you acknowledge millions of pedophiles engage instead in much unethical and illegal CSAM, having no interest in lolisho works whatsoever, as it’s not interchangeable for them in terms of value. And the thousands of lolisho fans that have no interest, let alone experience attraction, to real minors, is also worthy to be acknowledged
You yourself said it: Prostasia is focused on helping pedophiles like you live decent lives. Which is fine, but it’s not a child safety organization. Throughout their whole activity, they focused on everything, except child safety itself. Shoeonhead is horrible, that is true, but the claim I made is independent of her and it’s the reason this organization is on life support now
How do we feel about this?
1 Like
You cannot win with these people. This fallacy falls under the 2D is the same as 3D argument.
3 Likes
Whatever. Mods sided with me. I consider that a win. Dude accused me of being pro-c and looking for CSAM. He can go fuck himself. He should be fucking banned IMO, but whatever.
5 Likes
Update: he deleted his account after mods sided with me. Fucking lol.
2 Likes