Don’t forget Texas v. Johnson (1989).
The government may not prohibit the verbal or nonverbal expression of an idea merely because society finds the idea offensive or disagreeable.
That doll ownership is about an activity that’s conducted within the confines of solitude adds a layer to that.
I’d say Lawrence v. Texas , 539 U.S. 558 (2003), is more on point.
Well, time to put theory to practice: Man Charged for Dolls in Florida (looking for a follow up)
This is somewhat amusing.
I wonder what response asking whether the Creator cares about how someone handles a doll would elicit.
I doubt such a question would be answered in a straightforward manner.