In August 2022, a YouTuber named Reality Syndrome made a series of videos in which he “exposes” Prostasia. He did so after having watched Shoe0nHead’s video on Prostasia, which was talked about in this thread:
Right now, RS has 42 subscribers, so he’s not well known, yet. He currently has 3 videos on Prostasia. Let’s take a look at them. I’ll just mention some of the more relevant parts. Any emphasis added is my own.
Please note that this post ended up being a lot longer than I had anticipated. It was too much for one post. Therefore, I split it into multiple posts. I apologize for the inconvenience.
His first video on Prostasia:
-At 0:31, RS says:
This [Prostasia Foundation] is a group that supports, and is made up of, people that call themselves “MAPs”, “Minor Attracted People”. People that are attracted to young children. They’re trying to redefine the word “pedophile”. I know a lot of people out there already know about this, but there’s some that don’t, and I know that some parents do watch my channel that don’t know about this, so I’m gonna try and get the word out to them so that they can spread the word to others as well.
Note: Yeah, get the word out. Prostasia needs volunteers!
-At 2:06, after going onto MAP Support Club’s page, RS says:
I don’t know about anyone else, but if they’re attracted to minors, they may be committed to never harming them, which is kind of doubtful. Just that attraction and the things that could lead to could definitely lead to harm if you ask me.
Note: RS says this after reading MSC’s main page, where they state that they support MAPs while also trying to prevent CSA. Needless to say, RS is not buying it. We’re about to find out why.
Let’s talk about the Prostasia Foundation, how they support the initiative to reduce Child Sexual Abuse. Well, good for them, but they’re supporting pedophiles, which… I don’t see how that’s going to work out really, but hey.
Note: There it is. The whole reason why he’s doing this. “We must stop the evil pedophiles from harming kids.” Somebody should tell him stigma doesn’t prevent abuse.
It says “experts believe that peer support for stigmatized populations is one of them”. Yeah, peer support, that’s great and everything, but you’re just giving pedophiles a chance to meet up with other pedophiles and “talk shop” basically. Says “the average age in which Minor Attracted People discover their attractions is 14 years old”. So, at 14, you’re attracted to minors as long as they’re not like under 13 or so, you know. Maybe 12, but that’s still pushing it. You know, if you’re 14 going out with another 14 year old, that’s natural, that’s normal. So, you know, that’s not really being a Minor Attracted Person, that’s just being attracted to people your own age and your own age group.
Note: Wow, he can read! That’s awesome! Too bad he fails to understand why MSC exists and what a MAP actually is.
Goes on to talk about how Prostasia is “the official child protection organization partner for MAP Support Club and is their legal point of contact”. Now, Prostasia is a 501c3 charity in California, but they are not registered as a child protection organization with the government, or with anyone for that matter, so… The only one that calls them a “child protection organization” is themselves.
Note: I’m just gonna link this here: https://www.guidestar.org/profile/82-4969920
It says here “MAP Support Club runs its own staff. Already, Prostasia has helped MSC develop the technology to scan their chat for illegal images of children”. Well, that’s great, at least, you know, they’re doing that. Talks more here about how they’re supporting their members and if you’re not a MAP, you can help out. And if you see here, they got their little fundraiser going on. Raised five thousand dollars of a ten thousand dollar goal. Oh, I don’t understand that, but people will give money to anything, I guess, to get a tax break. I imagine that’s what it is at least.
Also, as you can see here, they got words that are tags that are frequently used. They’re “popular tags”, such as “Child Pornography”, “Child Sexual Abuse”, “consensual kink with children” and just all kinds of sick stuff like that I see. “Pedophilia”, “Pornography”, all this having to do with children and all kinds of other sex-based stuff with children! That’s… Kind of sick if you ask me. I mean, I don’t know what anyone else out there thinks, but yeah, that’s kinda disgusting.
Note: Maybe if he actually read some of the articles that are linked with those tags, he would understand better Prostasia and MSC’s goals. But then, that would expose his ignorance.
Now, here we are at the actual MAP Support Club. Now, this says: “MAP Support Club is a community for Minor Attracted People who are fundamentally against child sexual abuse and committed to never harm children. It is intended as a community where MAPs can connect with one another, offer and receive support in difficult times and overall just enjoy a relaxed atmosphere where one can have fun and not be judged.” Basically, pedophiles meeting with other pedophiles to “talk shop”. That’s… Sick and disgusting in my opinion. But… That’s just how I feel about it. Let me know if you agree down in the comments below.
Note: “Pedophiles are sick and disgusting… In my opinion. Lemme know what y’all think. Just so you know, if you disagree, you might be a pedophile.”
Now, we got our “community rules” for this organization. “You must be committed to never engaging in sexual activity with a child. You must be at least 13 years old to join this chat.” So, that means they’re letting 13 year old children in this chat with people that admit that they’re attracted to minor children, also known as “pedophiles”. So, not only are they “talking shop”, they’re providing 13 year old for them to possibly… Talk to and groom or whatever. That’s just… [Groans] I just don’t understand that.
Note: Remember when RS read earlier that “the average age in which MAPs discover their attractions is 14 years old”? He didn’t understand that, but here, he actually admits it. So really, this video (and the others) is just him being ignorant, not that it wasn’t obvious.
And “no admissions of unadjudicated illegal activities are allowed”. So, well, that’s a rule… Why? Because… That means people in this chat have done illegal activities and they just don’t want them talking about it so that they don’t get in trouble. But, they know that there’s people in there that have abused children.
Note: Jumping to conclusions… Nice.
It says “no talk about lowering Age of Consent (AoC), whatever it is where you live”. Now, you’ll see here in a little bit, they may not be talking about that, I’ve got a screenshot from that chatroom from someone. But, yeah, they definitely like them young.
Note: I can’t wait for that epic screenshot that will definitely expose MSC once and for all!
Says “no talk about adult-child sex being fundamentally OK (How is that fundamentally OK?) and only harmful due to societal attitudes and reactions to its discovery, nor discussions of the topic. There are other places on the Internet to have these discussions. This is not one of them.” Yeah, dark web maybe is a place for that, but not on the regular Internet, where children can actually see this crap and be influenced by it. That’s… I don’t know, it’s just sick and wrong if you ask me.
Note: Oh hey, he actually made a good po- Wait, what do you mean he’s talking about MSC?
Also, he basically says “Pedophiles are sick and disgusting… In my opinion.” Again. Don’t expect him to stop saying that.
Says here “no avatar images of real children are permitted. Avatars of drawings of children will only be permitted if they are not realistic nor sexually suggestive. It must be obvious that it is a drawing (i.e. cartoon/anime). This will be to the discretion of the Moderator team, and you will be asked to change your avatar to comply with this rule.” So… You won’t be asked to leave or anything. Just have to change your avatar, then you can keep on talking to little kids and everything. Makes perfect sense.
Note: Oh yeah, looks like I’m in the clear!
Says “no offensive or sexually suggestive usernames, and no names of real child celebrities. You will be asked to change your username to comply with this rule. No quoting anyone outside the community without permission from the person being quoted.” Okay… Well, whatever. Guess they don’t want to quote other pedos or anything like that. Don’t see why they even want to deal with this stuff, but hey.
Note: Oh noes! I’m quoting someone outside the community without their permission!
I went onto the MSC main page and saw that the quote rule has since been changed. Here’s what it says now:
Do not post screenshots or quotes of MSC outside MSC without the permission of everyone involved.
To me, that makes a lot more sense. I’m guessing it’s for privacy reasons. But, would it make sense to RS? Probably not.
“No disclosing personal information about a member trusted to you in confidence with other members, or to the outside public. This can be grounds for permanent banning.” So, doxxing can get you banned, but all this other stuff that could possibly harm children? Nah, it’s okay. Just make a little change, everything will be all right. Just don’t dox anyone.
Note: “Doxxing? Bad. Sexually abusing children? Good, but let’s say it’s bad and cover it up.” That’s probably how he thinks MSC functions in his mind.
“No sexually explicit or arousing descriptions. No images or videos of children if they would be arousing to an average pedophile (shirtless, swimsuit, underwear).” So… That means most likely that people have posted images like that before… But… So, they had to make that rule and it’s something that probably happened in the past and probably continues to happen and they probably just get told off: just take that down, it’s okay.
Note: “Probably happened”… Okay, it might’ve, but how do you know that the people running the site didn’t already have it as a rule? Are you assuming that they came up with the rule after it (supposedly) happened? Probably.
“No images or videos of children for the sake of sharing “cute” or “hot” kids (There’s no such thing as a “hot” kid, what the hell?). If relevant to an ongoing discussion, an occasional image will be allowed as long as it doesn’t violate rule #11.” So, if you’re talking about what you consider “hot” kids… You can post what you consider to be… An attractive child? Because, it’s part of the discussion? How the hell does that make any sense? What… Oh…
Note: Oh no, I think it might be overloading his brain! It’s too much for him!
If only he hadn’t stayed ignorant.
“No child nudity and/or pornography, no child erotica, virtual child porn or any other talk about how or where to access such materials, or requests for such materials, even if (il)legal in your jurisdiction. Treat others with respect if you disagree with your opinions, no personal attacks and no flaming.” Oh, I don’t know, how about, uh… No, uh… Hurting CHILDREN! No talking about how you want to hurt children or how you are attracted to children or anything like that. You know, that seems like a much better idea to me. But, you know, I guess I’m just weird or something. But, uh, anyway those are the nice little rules to their little chat group.
Note: FYI, the rule clearly says “even if legal in your jurisdiction”, but for some reason, RS says “illegal”.
Also, who at MSC (or even at Prostasia for that matter) is suggesting hurting children? Even then, I’m pretty sure those who would want to hurt children probably wouldn’t even care for other people in general. In other words, RS is confusing pedophilia with sociopathy!
Now, I did make up a Burner account and was going to try to join this chat group, but, uh… They quiz… You gotta go through like tests and quizzes and all kinds of stuff before you’re allowed into the chat room. Those are tests I did not want to take and knew I could not pass and so I’ll leave that up to someone else to try to get into that chat group. And, uh, get information out of it.
Note: Wow, so not only does he fail to actually join MSC (to “expose” them), he leaves the “dirty” job for someone else! That’s kinda lazy if you ask me.
Like I said, I’ve got a screenshot here in a minute from it to show everyone. But, uh, yeah. They’re going through an awful lot of measures to protect that chat room, so it makes it seem like there’s a little more going on there than, uh, what they’re letting on about. But, uh, that’s just my opinion, I could be wrong.
Note: It’s just his opinion… He could be wrong… Okay, enough of the suspense, where’s that screenshot you promised?
And as you can see here, I’m highlighting rule #11 again, because “no images or videos of children if they would be arousing to an average pedophile.” And then, rule #12: “No images or videos of children for the sake of sharing “cute” or “hot” kids. If relevant to an ongoing discussion, an occasional image will be allowed as long as it doesn’t violate rule #11.” Oh, so wonderful… They’ll allow it, as long as it’s relevant to a discussion.
Now, as you see here, this is a Tweet from Sheila van den Heuvel-Collins. She was a writer on Prostasia, she has published books. Uh, you can get them on… You can see them on Amazon. And one of them is a… Book for MAPs! It is called “Past the Dark Field: The Teen Stories”. It says “this book contains five age-appropriate stories about adolescent anti-contact non-offending Minor Attracted Persons”. So, literally, this person has wrote a book about people attracted to children. Like, that’s a bit weird, but, uh… What’s weirder here is this Tweet. And as you can see it says [Reads the Tweet]. Now, I didn’t know what a lot of these words meant when I saw them. “Pedophile”, yeah, knew what it meant. I, unfortunately, looked these words up and kind of wish I wouldn’t have… A “nepiophile” is someone that’s attracted to babies. Literal babies. Um… “Hebephile”, I think that’s a prepubescent or, uh, right at puberty, and… “Ephebophiles”, if I remember correctly, is like up to 17 years old or so. But still. Nepiophiles, that’s people literally attracted to babies, to infants. That’s just sick, I just can’t believe that.
Note: “Nepiophiles, pedophiles, hebephiles and ephebophiles are sick and disgusting… In my opinion.”
Here is that screenshot from that chat. And, uh, one guy here asked someone “what’s your aoa?”, which… Didn’t know what that meant, but apparently, that meant “age of attraction”. The other person said “little boys are perfect. Age 1 to 7.” Another guy says “Good age”. I guess his, uh, is 1 to 10. And says “as long as it’s before puberty”. So, yeah, more sick stuff. And that’s what they talk about in that chat with kids that are as young as 13 years old. But, probably younger than 13 years old. Who knows, there might be kids in there, 8, 9, 10 years old. There’s no way that they could tell or no.
Note: Finally, the screenshot that we’ve been waiting for!
The big question is… Does RS know that there are people like me who are attracted to minors AND adults?
And, as you can see here, you can support Prostasia Foundation with Amazon Smile. So, you can literally go on Amazon, and give money, and help pedophiles. That’s… How in the hell is that even legal or right, that makes no frickin sense whatsoever. I don’t understand that at all. But, uh, like I said, this is going to be a series of videos. There’s a lot more stuff that I’ve found and definitely want to talk about. I know YouTube’s not going to be happy about me talking about this stuff, but people need to know about it, so I’m going to get it out there if I possibly can. I’m a small channel anyway. Don’t get the most views in the world anyway, so, it’s not like it’s going to hurt my views, so, I don’t really care. I’m going to do it anyway.
Note: “Donating to Prostasia? Bad. Why? Because they support MAPs! I’m gonna expose them and YouTube can’t do much to me since I’m a small channel. I’m only willing to do this because I care about children. Pedophiles don’t have rights, they are a threat to children, so they must pay!”