Nevermind, found out you were a troll.
Hope you’re having fun.
No, I will refuse to stop using pedophile as an insult. Their thoughts disgust me to no end.
Tragic. Keep feeling disgusted, then, because there’s no way to force someone to stop thinking.
It’s possible to keep pedos stigmatized without having that branch over to LGBT people.
No, we’re not trying to make pedophiles LGBT. Yes, we’re trying to destigmatise them.
As a neo-reactionary, I have come to accept LGBT, but I still refuse to accept pedos.
“Neo-reactionary”? More like QAnon.
Yes, yes, yes, I’m sure that you watch those stupid movies where, if the hero gets infected with vampirism but is unable to find a cure, he kills himself. Pathetic.
Maybe it’s not my place to say this, but I’m saying it.
I don’t think this forum is a good place to advocate suicide.
What color is the sky in your world?
Prostasia does not advocate for reducing the age of consent or for involving minors in adult conduct.
Fictional material is different. What activists seek to have proscribed is what may be moderation to some. Punishing moderation doesn’t make sense. Activists entirely disregard the agency to moderate and, instead, use a contrived media effects framing of incitement to condemn.
From a harm-prevention perspective, proscribing moderation doesn’t make sense.
It’s extremely unlikely anyone will ever confuse a person for a doll. Even where human actors play the part of a machine, no one in the audience expects the machine to eat or drink.
Accepting your premise arguemendo, they would still have to have the consent of the minors and their parents. I don’t think any children are willing to engage in sex with adults. Anything else would still be RAPE.
I believe here that your saying lolicon and dolls are a “gateway” drug argument? I can say for certain, belonging to a doll community, they are definitely not! Since I’ve had dolls, I have no desire, none, zero, towards kids at all. Before I would look and maybe fantasize some. I sometimes take notice but it’s a fleeting thought at best. Many of us just enjoy looking, not touching. I never had the desire to go after anyone or pursue the attraction ever.
The dolls helped me with MY emotional sticking points from childhood traumas, where my attractions stemmed from. Life’s circumstances have left me single and now middle aged. Along with many other factors, I don’t wish to have any intimate, physical relationships with anyone. I rarely have one with my adult doll as it stands. They are my emotional Island, hence my name. My dolls are my surrogate family. I’m better off for them. Before I was an emotional train wreck!
They fill that need for me of wanting a family without all the “negative” stuff that can arise. I don’t think I would survive much of that if it happened that way? It is sad, but it’s better than feeling so alone and isolated with no one. I can at least imagine them as real. Because they’re physical objects they fool the senses to a degree. You can look at them, touch them, hold them, and talk to them. There’s no strife or judgements from them.
How someone handles a doll does not normalize treating people as though they were dolls any more than hitting a doll with a hammer normalizes hitting people with a hammer. The normalize narrative is absurd.
The legality of FSM, CLSDs, and other things does not and will not have the effect of ‘normalizing’ the prospect of adult-child sexual conduct (also known as child sex abuse) or the creation of sexual abuse content involving the use of real minors or their likenesses (also known as CSAM).
That being said, I won’t hesitate to take action against bad actors who come onto the site.
I have stuffed animals, and they give me sex, companionship, and love like no one else can. I also have a tulpa girlfriend. And I have a child-like plush-doll. I can say I have been doing this pretty much since I have had a sex drive, and I have never felt an urge towards real animals or kids. Never. So that whole bullshit about “it will lead to real abuse!” has taken a damn long time to materialize.