Due to repeated abuse of this forum by visitors from QAnon, we are instituting a temporary moratorium on new posts about sex dolls. Any new posts on this topic will be deleted, regardless of who created them.
This moratorium will be reviewed on December 7.
Despite the temporary ban of sex doll topics, the QAnon mobs keep trolling using other topics. Good thing our members are wise, calm, and well educated.
However, I don’t know if we can fight against them like this forever.
Well, how do other forums deal with trolls?
The only thing I can think of is some kind of embargo after registering where users can’t post anything for about a week.
Also, maybe denying certain e-mail accounts from being used during registration. (Throwaway/temporary e-mail services, etc.)
New user registration has been disabled for now. Registration now requires an invitation code. To request a code, email [email protected] or send a direct message on Twitter.
It’s a shame that such punitive measures had to be taken in order to combat this rampant abuse of our forum.
No one is abusing your forum. Prostasia needs to get over themselves. They are not the victims of abuse. People are criticizing them for their moronic posts.
Criticism? It’s the same handful of users creating accounts trying to evade bans for creating spam threads where all they do is virtue signal and declare that we’re wrong. We in turn respond to their posts with valid counterarguments backed up by links to scientific literature, while also blowing their weak points out of the water but they don’t listen. They just repeat the previous steps as an attempt to deface our forum, which is to be professional.
Criticism would be an invitation for rapport, for discussion where both sides speak and listen to each other’s points. Your kind even admit that they’re not willing to change their minds when they post, so why even call it that?
It’s spam. It’s abuse. And it will not be tolerated.
For an organization that professes to love free speech, you guys don’t seem to embody it. Expanding the definition of what is a threat to include statements such as “person X will die if they do Y”. Removing posts encouraging image offenders and nonces to get help via stopitnow by warning them they could be harmed if they do not do as they are told.
Look dude… We all saw the screenshots. Like you guys can’t make stuff up or hide. We know what’s really been going on. Also sharing a single study is not a refutation. You guys need to do a better job distinguishing between correlation and causation. A lot of them create lots of threads because they are in shock and terror that Prostasia exists. They weren’t doing it to troll. But were expressing anger.
Dude, it’s not hard. Since you are one of the few QAnon members who haven’t been suspended yet and since new registrations are now invitation-only, just be respectful if you want to keep your posting privileges. Don’t use slurs against people who are presumptively innocent of any wrongdoing (and yes that includes “nonce”!) Don’t make threats. Don’t repeatedly spam the same content. You are on a razor’s edge here if you want to keep your account.
It is an implication of violence or malice, which is a form of a threat.
Prostasia already has links to these organizations and works with them to send at-risk individuals. Posting the same messages over and over is a form of spam, and it will not be tolerated on this forum.
And you need to familiarize yourself with statistics and what these terms mean, and that there are different ways a statistical correlation could be seen as intrinsic, in that if X consistently and positively correlate with Y, it helps form the backbone of a predictive model. And the data we share are designed to reflect that sex dolls, virtual/fictional CP do not meet those requirements when measured with proper scrutiny. You need to actually read the literature we provide.
Prostasia would be nothing without this necessary data.
They’re in shock and terror because they refuse to listen, to learn. They come in with a pre-conceived notion backed by emotion, not reason, that we’re consistently debunking and disproving, with science and research.
Also QAnon isn’t designed to be taken seriously. You’re a fringe group of conspiracy theorists who harass other charities simply because someone on the internet said to do so. But I suppose it isn’t your fault that you think this way.
Each of these ridiculous QAnon posters makes me hit the donate button again, and again and again — love Prostasia!
It is an implication of violence or malice, which is a form of a threat.
You need to be able to distinguish between a warning and a threat to cause harm.
And you need to familiarize yourself with statistics and what these terms mean, and that there are different ways a statistical correlation could be seen as intrinsic, in that if X consistently and positively correlate with Y, it helps form the backbone of a predictive model. And the data we share are designed to reflect that sex dolls, virtual/fictional CP do not meet those requirements when measured with proper scrutiny. You need to actually read the literature we provide.
Prostasia would be nothing without this necessary data.
Not enough to be convincing. You need a ton of evidence. Otherwise there are too many variables that could have caused the decline in sex crimes. Better sex ed being one of them.
They’re in shock and terror because they refuse to listen, to learn. They come in with a pre-conceived notion backed by emotion, not reason, that we’re consistently debunking and disproving, with science and research.
Maybe don’t openly call for child sex dolls to be legalized? You guys would do a far better job at convincing us if you pointed out many dolls are small and sort of seem child like, but are really designed to be small and young adults. I refuse to condone pedophiles thought patterns. Finding youthful small adults attractive is fine, finding a 12 year old sexually attractive is evil and should never be legalized.
That’s why we are raising funding to get more evidence: Exploring the use of fictional and fantasy sexual outlets - Prostasia Foundation
To be clear, finding anyone or anything sexually attractive is already legal. How could that even be made illegal? You are at liberty to find it disgusting and not to associate with people who have sexual interests or attractions that you don’t like. But making pure thoughts illegal? That’s a step too far for any democracy.
That’s like a mob boss saying that “accidents” will happen. Again, the stupid peasants who burn witches out of fear and envy are the ones who deserve immolation.
The accused need no convincing. Burden of proof is on the accuser. Scum like you should consider the very fact that we even deign to speak to you a tremendous honor. Kneel in gratitude, lowlife.
That’s just it. Dolls have no age. If you would like, anyone can easily say that the doll represents a “small adult”. Again, I’ll do it right now. And before I allowed you to rest easier, you should once again kowtow in gratitude.
Wait… It’s LEGAL for someone to be sexually attracted to a prepubescents child??? Really? Well that is news to me. WTF that is super surprising.