This update to CP law is unconstitutional, as it covers fictitious material without either an obscenity requirement or an affirmative defense (like in federal law) allowing defendants to show the images are either of adults appearing younger or of fictitious minors.
Just want to clarify that this is limited to photorealistic depictions since a lot of people went crazy before on twitter.
“Depiction of a computer-generated child” means,
with respect to an image of a child contained in visual material, a
depiction:
[…]
that to a reasonable person is virtually indistinguishable from an actual child younger than 18 years of age.