There is a war going on at Twitter the past few days against childlike-sex dolls. And as you know, I hate calling them that. Because for many of us they are not sex-dolls. They are surrogate daughters for some, comfort for grief over losing a child for others. I and others have special ordered them to be NOT functional in that regard. We just love them.
Granted there are many people that use them for what they were made, but they still care more about them than just an Onahole. And possibly some people who think of them just as toys. I don’t know any.
This crusade these people are on, we doll owners as a community feel, does NOT protect chidren. It may be endangering some. We argue and everyone acknowledges there are no real studies to prove either way. I know there was one last year that concluded doll owners are happy with their dolls and have no desire to go looking to act against real children. Although quoted, and 2nd and 3rd hand quoted, were always part of hit pieces dispariging dolls and doll owners.
My new account there is mentioned along with others. Many got banned. I mention Prostastia and they reared like a hissing cobra.
" He identified himself as a member of US-based pro-pedophilia group, Prostasia Foundation: they hyperlinked their article about Prostasia.
The woman that runs this feel-good propaganda organization is I believe a survivor of some kind. She’s Australian too.
In their about page here again I see it’s all about winning people over to her jaded, sexualized view of everything.
“Since we launched in 2010, we have achieved a huge number of significant wins.”
She is absolutely going about her crusade in completely the wrong way. Vilifying innocent people. Accusing them of thought and future crimes.
Here’s the latest article I just received.