So, this entire article title is inflammatory clickbait. Him having hentai alongside CSAM isn’t noteworthy in the slightest. Imagine if he had adult pornography alongside CSAM instead, would it have been mentioned at all in the article?
This reminds me of a thread I made a while back, when a mass shooter was exposed as having a CLSD and everybody started using his murders as proof that doll owners are inherently evil and dangerous:
“If a person masturbated to loli hentai and then committed a terrorist bombing, that means the lolis made him do it and we need to ban them!”
That might as well be what moral guardians are suggesting. It’s “vidya gaems caus violins” all over again. All these people share an ignorant, stupid view of the world…