I saw this topic, called “FB says you guys want to legalize child sex dolls wtf”: FB group says you guys want to LEGALIZE "Child sex dolls" WTF - #4 by Chie
The creator of the topic said “FB group said”, as if it matter what FB groups are saying… When i said the title of his topic, i thought FB means FBI, not facebook. So i was about to talk about the human experiments FBI did in the past.
Why some people think that it matters what random people on facebook are saying? Are these people sociologists / psychologists? No? Then they DON’T know if child sex dolls are a good thing or not.
Before i say why child sex dolls should be legalized, i will debunk some of his claims.
CLAIM: “Lots of people on facebook posting about how fucked up prostasia is including sharing screenshots of your posts.”
FACT: Random people on facebook, are not sociologists nor psychologists, so their opinion on such topis should not be taken seriously.
CLAIM: “How can you support legalizing something so heinous???”
FACT: I don’t know if prostasia want to legalize that. What i do know, is that legalizing child sex dolls is the best and most moral think to do, if YOU hate pedophiles and don’t want them to have sex with children. Why is it moral? I will explain it later.
CLAIM: When LITERALLY 85% of the general public wants it to be a criminal offense, you damn well know it’s fucked up. There has never been a time in history where over 66.66% of the general public supports jim crow laws or anti gay laws. When such a huge percentage such as 85% want it to be a criminal offense, IT MUST be made a criminal offense.
FACT: Don’t ask the general public. Ask sociologists and psychologists. The general public is ruled by stereotypes and emotions - scientists are ruled by facts and actual data.
There are more claims, but im not going to debunk them all.
Why is it moral to legalize child sex dolls? Imagine for a moment that children can’t consent. If biological children can’t, and sex with biological children cause harm, and there are people who want to have sex with biological children, would’t it be better for people who want to have sex with children to be allowed to have sex with non-real children that are not able to experience “harm”?
Morality doesn’t mean to limit people and restrict anything you don’t like. Religious morality is not valid form of morality.
QUOTE FROM MY PETITION: “Religious morality, for example, accepts slavery, but rejects same-sex relationships. Morality should makes people happy and minimize suffering. Slavery is suffering, but it’s accepted by religion, same-sex relationships are not suffering, but aren’t accepted by religion, therefore religious moral is not valid. If we want to be moral, we have to be tolerant and to minimize suffering.”
Here is the logic:
Sex with real children causes harm, according to people.
Banning sex with children causes harm/sadness to childlovers.
============
Sex with child dolls doesn’t cause harm, dolls can’t experience harm.
Allowing sex with child dolls causes fullfillment for childlovers, while lowers the “harm” to real children.
This is how to minimize harm, and keep everyone happy. We have to listen to natural morality, not to dogmatic morality. Natural Morality describes a form of morality that is based on how humans evolved, rather than a morality acquired from religious teachings.
If child sex dolls are legalized, more childlovers will do it with dolls, instead of wanting to do it with real children. This is continue for another 50 years, until the acceptance of MAPS reaches the point when being a MAP will be viewed as being gay in 2020. Right now, being a MAP is viewed as being a gay in the Dark Ages.
If legalization of child sex dolls can minimize harm then dolls have to be legalized. The person who created the topic about theFB group, is one of these people who think the girls in hentai videos are being raped against their will. Hentai is NOT rape!!! Very a few people can understand it.
We have to make laws that will make everyone happy. Acceptance and tolerance are the keys to good utopia.
