I think we’ve been infiltrated by a Chicom, specifically Ping_Shih. Wow, I feel like Dante from Devil May Cry. My grandpa was a Chicom, so I have a nose for hunting Chicoms. Like how Dante is a devil hunter (because commies are devils) born from a devil.
3 Likes
MacKinnon’s position on porn and sexual expression was entirely based on a nonsensical, sex-negative paradigm that imposed her subjective viewpoint on that of women, which just so happened to align with the positions of theocrats and conservative or traditionalist ideologues which were designed to control sexuality. MacKinnon’s positions about porn were inherently anti-woman in the same way that Phyllis Schlafly’s positions on gender equality were, in that they sought to masquerade as ‘progressive’ when in actuality they would have done nothing to shift the status quo in a way that achieved true feminine equity or equality, because ultimately they were still parroting viewpoints which were formulated and perpetuated by men to suppress and control society at the expense of a woman’s right to be equal and free.
3 Likes
If straight male / female porn was the only type that existed, you may have a point. However it doesn’t explain the existence and popularity of solo female porn, lesbian porn, bisexual, trans, or gay porn.
Personally I am bisexual with a preference for females, but I also like seeing guys go at it once in a while too.
You can’t claim anyone is being discriminated against when all parties involved are consensual and obviously having a good time.
1 Like
Because apparently male gaze exclusively is bad. I mean, there are idiots who want to remove sexy characters from games but are under the delusion that they are just making games “more sexy for more people”. Apparently, they’ve never heard the expression about catching 2 hares. Of course, that might be by design, given that they’re clearly trying to appeal to the trans gaze, instead:
In the spirit of “better to offend others than let others offend me”, I have no shame, qualms, or remorse in saying that I definitely prefer media centered around the cis-male gaze, instead.
Better than an obsession to remove all discrimination as an excuse to get rid of freedom. I prefer freedom over safety, especially the safety of the pwecious feewings.
I’m sure that you know this already, but depending on the context, 負 Fù can mean betray, offend, do wrong, mathematically negate, etc. As a male with functioning eyes, I like media that appeals the male gaze. Blazes with the rest.
One’s justice is another’s injustice. Take the universe and grind it down to the finest powder and sieve it through the finest sieve and then show me one atom of justice, one molecule of mercy.
No, if I were female, I would buy media appealing to female gazes. It’s almost as if not all products need to be for all people. Crazy, right? No, I am for true equality. Therefore, I despise equity in all its forms.
Fuck. These days media appealing to the female gaze are more common. Look at all the fighting games with shirtless males but have the female characters more covered up, especially compared to previous installments of the given franchise. True gender equality:
That’s true equality. Not equity. As I said before, I hate equity.
1 Like
No one deserves an extra layer of mercy. Reverse discrimination is still discrimination.
1 Like
You straight up admitted that treating different people different ways based on the color of their skin is “equality”. You make me sick. I’m guessing that you’re some kind of Marxist, spouting filthy garbage about oppressor and oppressed groups?
1 Like
You got me. I “discriminate” based on talent. I believe in meritocracy.
2 Likes
You want to hinder my freedoms. You believe in despotism.
Merit is rational. Pity points are not.
1 Like
You basically just listed everything. You fail to even grasp why broad “justice” can be.
WTF are political rights? “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.” Also, the whole point of protected speech is for the more controversial stuff. Mainstream bullshit doesn’t need “protection”. Without that, whatever freedom your despotic dream state is offering is worthless. Yes, you support despots, just ones who protect your feelings.
2 Likes
Yes, I’m sure that you think they only have the right to infringe certain people’s rights.
Like banning porn? Because, in your warped view, only straight men watch it?
Damn, that’s some equally spread “inequality”, then. I don’t think you understand what “inequality” means. Sounds like you’re just using it for anything that makes you feel uncomfortable. OK, then I will proudly declare that I am for anything that you call the spook known as “inequality”.
And again: Damn, that’s some equally spread “inequality”, then. I don’t think you understand what “inequality” means. Sounds like you’re just using it for anything that makes you feel uncomfortable.
Sounds like you’re scared of ultimately fictional media. Let’s see how crazy you really are. What’s your take on violent video games?
Huh, it seems that I win. To reiterate, if I had to choose between an anti-porn Republic and an Empire that allows porn, I will declare daily: Long Live the Empire!
1 Like
Ah, so someone’s trying to avoid a ban by using sock puppets. Hold on. You will be dealt with.